Prepare for the Adobe Workfront for Experience Manager Enhanced Connector Expert exam with our extensive collection of questions and answers. These practice Q&A are updated according to the latest syllabus, providing you with the tools needed to review and test your knowledge.
QA4Exam focus on the latest syllabus and exam objectives, our practice Q&A are designed to help you identify key topics and solidify your understanding. By focusing on the core curriculum, These Questions & Answers helps you cover all the essential topics, ensuring you're well-prepared for every section of the exam. Each question comes with a detailed explanation, offering valuable insights and helping you to learn from your mistakes. Whether you're looking to assess your progress or dive deeper into complex topics, our updated Q&A will provide the support you need to confidently approach the Adobe AD0-E906 exam and achieve success.
A consultant is working with a customer's Marketing department on an Adobe Workfront engagement. The customer has already had a successful deployment of Workfront in the IT department. This installation has been extremely simple, with a single system administrator, five custom statuses used by the IT department, and some templates and reports. The director of Marketing is adamant that the Marketing department will not be using anything created for IT. The engagement cannot disrupt the existing installation.
Which approach should the consultant take?
In this scenario, the best approach is to create separate groups for Marketing and IT within the same Workfront instance. Each group will have its own group administrator, and each department's resources (e.g., custom statuses, templates, reports) can be isolated and managed independently by the group admins.
This solution ensures that:
The existing IT setup is not disrupted.
The Marketing department can have its own customized Workfront environment without overlapping with IT's configurations.
This approach avoids creating unnecessary complexity (as in Option A with companies) or restricting functionality (as in Option B with teams).
Refer to Workfront documentation on group management to learn how to implement group-specific configurations in a single instance.
A marketing campaign is being managed in Adobe Workfront As part of this, a user wants to utilize an asset that was created for a previous campaign. This asset exists within Experience Manager Assets. The Workfront for Experience Manager Enhanced Connector has been configured and installed.
How should the user accomplish this?
In this scenario, the user is managing a marketing campaign in Workfront and wants to use an existing asset from AEM Assets. Since the enhanced connector is already installed and configured, the user can go to the Documents area within the Workfront project, click Add new, and then select the Experience Manager integration.
This integration allows the user to browse assets stored in AEM and select the required asset, which will be linked to the Workfront project without the need to download and re-upload the file.
This seamless integration between Workfront and AEM Assets enhances workflow efficiency by enabling users to directly access and use assets from AEM within their Workfront environment.
For more information, refer to the documentation on Workfront and AEM Asset Integration, which covers the process of selecting and using AEM-stored assets within Workfront.
A web designer creates interactive web content via a URL. which needs to be approved I he user doing the reviewing has a Manager proofing permission profile in Adobe workfront. which they are currently accessing through the latest version of the Chrome browser. As part of the feedback process, the reviewer is required to leave comments on one page of the arte being reviewed before leaving the approval status. The Designer must be tagged in any updates required
which tool should be used to accomplish this?
In this scenario, the reviewer needs to leave comments on an interactive web content URL and tag the designer. The Web Proofing viewer is the appropriate tool for reviewing interactive web content in Adobe Workfront. The Web Proofing viewer allows users to:
Review and comment on web-based content directly in the browser.
Tag users in comments and updates.
Approve or reject the content with the necessary feedback.
Option A (Desktop Proofing viewer) is typically used for offline or downloadable content, and Option C (Legacy Proofing viewer) refers to an outdated tool that lacks modern proofing functionalities.
Refer to Workfront's proofing documentation for more information on using the Web Proofing viewer for interactive content.
A developer implements a custom workflow process using the following code:
The code bundle has been deployed to AEM and displays as active in the Web Console. The developer has created a new workflow model, added a process step, and wants to configure that step to use the custom workflow process. However, the custom workflow process does not appear in the dropdown menu.
What should be done to resolve this issue?
In AEM, for a custom workflow process to be available for selection in the dropdown menu of a process step, the process.name property must be set in the @Component annotation. This property defines the unique name under which the custom workflow process will be registered and visible in the workflow model editor.
Here is an example of how this should be added to the existing code:
@Component(service = WorkflowProcess.class,
property = {'process.label=Custom Workflow Process', 'process.name=customWorkflowProcess'})
process.label: This is the label that appears in the workflow model editor dropdown.
process.name: This is the internal identifier used by AEM to register the workflow process.
Options A and B would define other properties but will not resolve the issue of the custom workflow not appearing in the dropdown. The key property needed here is process.name.
For more details, refer to the AEM documentation on creating custom workflows and annotating components.
A user wants to create watermarked renditions of only some of the assets in AEM Assets. Which workflow strategy should be used to achieve this goal?
To create watermarked renditions for only some of the assets in AEM, the best approach is to create a new workflow model that includes the Add Watermark process. This new workflow can be selectively applied to specific assets as needed, rather than modifying the global DAM Update Asset workflow which would affect all assets.
Selective application: By creating a custom workflow model, users can choose which assets will go through the watermarking process, providing more control and preventing unnecessary watermarking of all assets.
Option B and C suggest modifying the existing DAM Update Asset workflow, which could result in watermarking all assets, not just the desired ones, and is not flexible for specific asset selection.
Refer to AEM's workflow documentation for more information on creating custom workflows and adding watermark processes.
Full Exam Access, Actual Exam Questions, Validated Answers, Anytime Anywhere, No Download Limits, No Practice Limits
Get All 55 Questions & Answers