Most Recent APICS CPIM-8.0 Exam Dumps

A push system is a production system that operates based on forecasts and schedules, rather than actual customer demand. A push system pushes products to the market regardless of the current demand, and often results in excess inventory and waste. A push system does not consider the capacity constraints of the work centers, and therefore may send work orders to them even if they are not able to process them. This can create bottlenecks, delays, and inefficiencies in the production process12.

The other options are not correct because:

* B. Work centers are scheduled using finite capacity planning. This is not a characteristic of a push system, but rather a pull system. Finite capacity planning is a method of scheduling that takes into account the actual capacity of the work centers, and only releases work orders when there is enough capacity to process them. This reduces the risk of overloading the work centers and improves the flow of production3.

* C. Work centers operate using decentralized control. This is not a characteristic of a push system, but rather a pull system. Decentralized control is a method of management that gives more autonomy and decision-making power to the work centers, and allows them to adjust their production according to the actual demand and capacity. This increases the flexibility and responsiveness of the production system4.

* D. Work centers signal previous work centers when they are ready for more work. This is not a characteristic of a push system, but rather a pull system. This is a common practice in a pull system that uses kanban cards as visual signals to trigger the production or replenishment of a product. The work centers only request more work when they have enough capacity and demand for it, and avoid overproduction and waste5.

The labor efficiency variance is the difference between the standard labor hours allowed for the actual output and the actual labor hours used, multiplied by the standard labor rate. In this case, the standard labor hours allowed for 100 pieces are 0.5 * 100 = 50 hours. The actual labor hours used are 48 hours. The standard labor rate is $10 per hour. Therefore, the labor efficiency variance = (50 - 48) * $10 = $20 favorable.This means that the actual labor hours used were less than the standard labor hours allowed, which indicates a higher labor efficiency12Reference:1: CPIM Part 2 - Section B - Module 2 - Session 2 - Variance Analysis2: CPIM Part 2 - Section B - Module 2 - Session 3 - Variance Analysis Example

Creating short-term wins is a useful element in the change process because it helps to build momentum, motivate the team, and overcome resistance. Short-term wins are concrete achievements that demonstrate the benefits of the change and provide evidence that the efforts are paying off. They also help to create a sense of urgency and alignment among the stakeholders involved in the change process. Calculating a break-even point, performing a SWOT analysis, and developing key performance indicators (KPIs) are all important tools for planning and evaluating the change process, but they are not as effective as creating short-term wins in generating support and commitment for the change.Reference:Change Management: The Kotter Model,APICS CPIM 8 Planning and Inventory Management | ASCM

The service part demand can be included in the gross requirements for the part. Gross requirements are the total demand for an item derived from all sources, such as customer orders, dependent demand, forecast, or safety stock. Service part demand is the demand for an item that is used to replace or repair a product after it has been sold to the customer. Service part demand is independent of the production of other items, and it can be forecasted based on historical data, warranty information, or customer contracts. Service part demand can be added to the gross requirements for the part, along with the dependent demand from the other part that uses it as a component.

Option A is not correct, because the low-level code of the part is not zero. Low-level code is the lowest level in the bill of material (BOM) at which an item appears as a component. An item that is not a component of any other item has a low-level code of zero. An item that is a component of another item has a low-level code equal to one plus the low-level code of the parent item. In this case, the part is a component of another part, so its low-level code is at least one.

Option B is not correct, because the material requirements for the part will not be understated. Material requirements are the net requirements for an item after deducting the available inventory and scheduled receipts from the gross requirements. If the service part demand is included in the gross requirements, the material requirements will reflect the true demand for the part. If the service part demand is not included, the material requirements will be understated, and the part may face stockouts or backorders.

Option D is not correct, because the part should have some safety stock. Safety stock is the extra inventory held to protect against uncertainties in demand, supply, or lead time. Safety stock can help reduce the risk of stockouts, improve customer service, and buffer against variability. The part should have some safety stock to account for the fluctuations in the service part demand, which may depend on factors such as product failure rate, customer behavior, or environmental conditions.

One way to mitigate liability risk in the supply chain is to require traceability for components. Liability risk is the risk that a party may be held responsible for certain types of losses caused by its actions or products to third parties1. Traceability is the ability to track the origin, history, location, and movement of a product or a component through the supply chain2. Requiring traceability for components can help to mitigate liability risk in the supply chain by enabling the identification and verification of the quality, safety, and compliance of the components, as well as the detection and prevention of counterfeit, defective, or hazardous components. Traceability can also facilitate the recall, repair, or replacement of faulty components, and the allocation of responsibility and accountability among the supply chain partners in case of a liability claim34. Reference: 1 What is a Liability Risk? - Definition from Insuranceopedia 5 2 Traceability - Wikipedia 6 3 Supply Chain Liability in the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence ... 7 4 CPIM Exam Reference - Association for Supply Chain Management 8