Most Recent APMG-International Better-Business-Cases-Practitioner Exam Dumps

Prepare for the APMG-International Better Business Cases Practitioner exam with our extensive collection of questions and answers. These practice Q&A are updated according to the latest syllabus, providing you with the tools needed to review and test your knowledge.

QA4Exam focus on the latest syllabus and exam objectives, our practice Q&A are designed to help you identify key topics and solidify your understanding. By focusing on the core curriculum, These Questions & Answers helps you cover all the essential topics, ensuring you're well-prepared for every section of the exam. Each question comes with a detailed explanation, offering valuable insights and helping you to learn from your mistakes. Whether you're looking to assess your progress or dive deeper into complex topics, our updated Q&A will provide the support you need to confidently approach the APMG-International Better-Business-Cases-Practitioner exam and achieve success.

The questions for Better-Business-Cases-Practitioner were last updated on Feb 20, 2025.

Viewing page 1 out of 19 pages.
Viewing questions 1-5 out of 96 questions

Get All 96 Questions & Answers

Question No. 1

Which detail should be explained in the Financial Case?

AAllocation of risk negotiated between the organization and the preferred service
provider.

BWritten confirmation of funding arrangements for the deal from the
organization's commissioners.

CUnderpinning method of payment for services and outputs.

DType of contract used and key contractual issues.

Show Answer

Correct Answer: B

Question No. 2

Using the Scenario, answer the following questions about the Financial Appraisal of the option to build a new campus on

the site of the Old Fire Station Headquarters.

Decide whether the action taken represents an appropriate application of the Five Case Model for this project and select the response

that supports your decision.

The cost of the temporary accommodation on the site of the Old Fire Station Headquarters has been treated as a revenue cost within

the Financial Appraisal. This temporary accommodation is required as part of the construction of the new campus.

Is this an appropriate application of the Five Case Model for the project?

ANo, because the Financial Appraisal should NOT contain revenue costs.

BNo, because construction and refurbishment costs should be treated as capital costs.

CYes, because all construction costs must be accounted for.

DYes, because these represent a cost of developing the scheme.

Show Answer

Correct Answer: B

Question No. 3

The Consortium has stated that within the next three years, it expects to see at least a 15% increase in the attainment of

qualifications. However, it has not proposed ways in which the success rates for qualifications can be increased.

Is this approach appropriate for defining the spending objectives in the Strategic Outline Case?

ANo, because without a solution to the problem, there is no way of calculating what the potential improvements might be.

BNo, because the Consortium should NOT be specifying the targeted outcomes.

CYes, because the Consortium has been formed to plan the transformation of education and learning.

DYes, because the Strategic Case should focus on what needs to be achieved in terms of the targeted outcomes and outputs rather than input in relation to the potential solution.

Show Answer

Correct Answer: D

Question No. 4

Answer the following questions about the benefits realization strategy, framework and plans that have been drafted for

the Pittville project.

Decide whether the entry is appropriate for the document identified and select the responses that support your decision.

Remember to select 2 answers to each question.

The Management Case states that the Western Area Learning Improvements Programme Director is ultimately responsible for:

1. Delivering the benefits of the Pittville project

2. Ensuring arrangements have been made to realize the benefits.

Which 2 statements apply to these entries?

AAmend entry 1, because the SRO of the programme and project should be ultimately responsible for delivering the benefits.

BAmend entry 1, because the SRO of the programme should delegate responsibility for delivering benefits to the Project Manager.

CAmend entry 2, because the SRO of the programme should ensure that mechanisms are in place for realizing benefits.

DNo change to entry 2, because the delivery of benefits should be tracked at programme level.

ENo change to entry 2, because the Programme Director should report on the delivery of benefits to the other members of the Consortium.

Show Answer

Correct Answer: A, D

Question No. 5

Which 2 observations correctly evaluate risks that could affect the affordability of this project?

AWithout the sale of Pittville High School, the project is no longer viable.

BThe project would still be viable if equipment costs were to double after Year 3.

CIf the other income were to be withdrawn for any reason, LEA Funding alone could fund the running costs of the scheme after Year 3.

DThe project would no longer be affordable if funding were to increase by 5%.

EIncome from the hire of the Sport Facilities must continue to increase every year for the scheme to be viable.

Show Answer

Correct Answer: A, E

Unlock All Questions for APMG-International Better-Business-Cases-Practitioner Exam

Full Exam Access, Actual Exam Questions, Validated Answers, Anytime Anywhere, No Download Limits, No Practice Limits

Get All 96 Questions & Answers