Most Recent Appian ACA100 Exam Questions & Answers

A records-centric design is the best approach to address this use case in Appian. This design allows users to interact with data through a central record type, with related actions enabling them to perform tasks like uploading documents, sending communications, and approving cases at any time or out of order.

Records-Centric Design:

This approach centralizes all related data and actions around a specific record type.

Users can trigger related actions such as document uploads or approvals directly from the record, ensuring flexibility and a user-friendly interface.

Why Not Other Options?:

A and B. Reports and dashboards are useful for visualizing data but are not as flexible for handling the ad-hoc and out-of-order activities described.

C . A sequential workflow is too rigid for a process where tasks need to be done out of order.

References:

Appian Documentation on Records: Records in Appian

Appian Community Success Guide: Designing Record-Centric Applications

A records-centric approach leverages Appian's strengths, providing a flexible and intuitive solution for complex workflows.

In Appian, the combination of an expression rule with a query allows you to directly access and use data from the Appian database. Expression rules are used to define business logic, while queries are used to retrieve data from the database.

Expression Rule with a Query:

An expression rule can be used to execute a query against the Appian database to retrieve data.

This combination allows you to filter, sort, and manipulate the data retrieved directly from the database within your application logic.

The a!queryEntity() function is commonly used within an expression rule to fetch data from a specific entity in the database.

Why Not Other Options?:

A . An expression rule with an integration call: This option is used for retrieving data from external systems, not directly from the Appian database.

C . A process model that uses an Export to Excel smart service: This is used for exporting data to Excel but does not directly access the database for querying purposes.

D . An interface object with an integration call: This combination is also used for interfacing with external systems rather than directly accessing the Appian database.

Implementation in Appian:

Define an expression rule that uses a!queryEntity() to fetch data from a specific table or view in the Appian database.

The query can be customized with filters, sorting, and paging to retrieve the exact data needed for the application.

References:

Appian Documentation on Expression Rules: Expression Rules in Appian

Appian Query Entity Function: a!queryEntity() Function

The most suitable integration approach for the given use case is web API-based integration (A). Web APIs allow real-time communication between the third-party system and Appian. The third-party system can send information to Appian through an HTTP request, which Appian processes, and then returns the case ID in the response. This real-time, synchronous interaction is ideal for scenarios where immediate feedback, like displaying a case ID on a confirmation screen, is required. Reference: Appian Documentation - Web APIs

Note: The other options---FTP/SFTP (B), integration objects (C), and message queues (D)---are not as suitable for real-time, synchronous interactions. FTP/SFTP is typically used for batch processing, integration objects facilitate interactions within Appian, and message queues are better suited for asynchronous processing.

The Milestone Component in Appian is the best choice for displaying the completed, current, and future approval steps of each purchase order. This component visually represents the progression of a process with distinct milestones, making it ideal for sequential tasks like approvals. Each milestone can indicate whether the step is completed, active, or pending, providing a clear and intuitive view of the approval process for users. Reference: Appian Documentation - Milestone Component

Note: The Progress Bar Component (A) is more suited for linear progress representation rather than distinct stages. The Gauge Component (B) and Org Chart Component (D) are not appropriate for this type of sequential task display.