Most Recent BCS PC-BA-FBA-20 Exam Dumps

A change strategy outlines how an organization will move from its current state to its desired future state. Its purpose is to ensure a structured and effective transition.

Key Considerations:

Ensuring the simplest way for transition: While simplicity is desirable, it is not the primary purpose of a change strategy.

Ensuring the quickest way for transition: Speed is not the main focus; effectiveness and alignment with goals are more important.

Achieving the transition between current state and future state: This accurately describes the purpose of a change strategy, which is to bridge the gap between where the organization is now and where it wants to be.

Mapping the alternative options: While mapping options may be part of the planning process, it is not the ultimate purpose of the change strategy.

Evaluation of Each Option:

A . Ensuring the simplest way for transition: Simplicity is a consideration but not the primary purpose of a change strategy. Conclusion: This is not correct .

B . Ensuring the quickest way for transition: Speed is secondary to achieving an effective and sustainable transition. Conclusion: This is not correct .

C . Achieving the transition between current state and future state: This is the core purpose of a change strategy, ensuring the organization moves effectively toward its goals. Conclusion: This is correct .

D . Mapping the alternative options: Mapping options is part of the analysis phase, not the overarching purpose of the strategy. Conclusion: This is not correct .

Final Recommendation:

The best description of the purpose of a change strategy is: C . Achieving the transition between current state and future state.

The Waterfall methodology is a linear approach where requirements are defined upfront, and changes are difficult to accommodate once the project begins. Agile methodology , on the other hand, emphasizes flexibility and adaptability to changing requirements.

Key Considerations:

Inherent Uncertainty in Cost: While cost uncertainty exists in both methodologies, Agile does not specifically address this drawback of Waterfall.

Inflexibility to Changing Requirements: Waterfall's rigid structure makes it difficult to incorporate changes once the project starts. Agile addresses this by allowing iterative development and continuous feedback.

Capturing All Requirements Upfront: Agile does not aim to capture all requirements upfront; instead, it embraces evolving requirements throughout the project.

Stakeholder Agreement on Scope Before Work Begins: Agile encourages ongoing collaboration with stakeholders rather than requiring scope agreement upfront.

Evaluation of Each Option:

A . The agile methodology addresses the inherent uncertainty in cost associated with waterfall: Agile does not specifically address cost uncertainty. Conclusion: This is not correct .

B . Agile development addresses the inflexibility of waterfall as it pertains to changing requirements: This is the primary drawback of Waterfall that Agile addresses through its iterative and flexible approach. Conclusion: This is correct .

C . The agile methodology captures all requirements at the start of a project to reduce risks typically experienced in waterfall: Agile does not capture all requirements upfront; it embraces evolving requirements. Conclusion: This is not correct .

D . Agile development requires stakeholders to agree to the scope of the project before the work begins, reducing uncertainty in the design: Agile does not require upfront scope agreement; it promotes adaptive planning. Conclusion: This is not correct .

Final Recommendation:

The drawback of Waterfall addressed in Agile is: B . Agile development addresses the inflexibility of waterfall as it pertains to changing requirements.

Change control is a critical aspect of requirements management in business analysis. It ensures that changes to requirements are systematically evaluated, approved, and implemented without negatively impacting the project.

Key Considerations:

Change Control Definition: Change control is a formal process used to manage modifications to requirements, ensuring that changes are necessary, feasible, and aligned with project goals.

Preventing Changes: Change control does not prevent changes but ensures they are managed appropriately.

Tracing Requirements: Tracing requirements involves tracking their origin and impact, which is separate from managing changes.

Evaluation of Each Option:

A . A process to control version numbering: Version numbering is a documentation practice, not the purpose of change control. Conclusion: This is not correct .

B . A process to manage changes to requirements: This accurately describes change control as a structured approach to handling modifications to requirements. Conclusion: This is correct .

C . A process to ensure that changes cannot be made: Change control does not block changes but ensures they are managed effectively. Conclusion: This is not correct .

D . A process to trace requirements: Tracing requirements is a related but distinct activity focused on linking requirements to their source and impact. Conclusion: This is not correct .

Gap analysis is a structured process used to identify the differences between the current state (as-is) and the desired future state (to-be). The first step in this process involves understanding the current situation.

Key Steps in Gap Analysis:

Assemble representations of the existing situation: This involves documenting the current state, including processes, systems, and capabilities.

Compare representations of the existing and target situations: After understanding the current state, it is compared with the desired future state to identify gaps.

Identify gaps to be addressed: Once gaps are identified, they are prioritized based on their impact and feasibility.

Consider possible actions to address the gaps: Finally, potential solutions or actions are developed to bridge the identified gaps.

Evaluation of Each Option:

A . Assemble representations of existing situation: Understanding the current state is the foundational step in gap analysis. Without this, there is no baseline for comparison. Conclusion: This is correct .

B . Consider possible actions to address the gaps: This is a later step in the process, not the first. Conclusion: This is not correct .

C . Compare representations of the existing and target situations: Comparison occurs after the current state has been documented. Conclusion: This is not correct .

D . Identify gaps to be addressed: Identifying gaps follows the documentation and comparison steps. Conclusion: This is not correct .

Final Recommendation:

The first step in the gap analysis process is: A . Assemble representations of existing situation.

When documenting risks in a business case, it is essential to follow structured processes to ensure risks are appropriately identified, analyzed, and managed. Let's evaluate each option again based on best practices outlined in the BCS Business Analysis Framework and other methodologies:

Key Considerations:

Risk Documentation: Risks must be recorded systematically to ensure they are visible, actionable, and traceable.

Ownership of Risks: Assigning ownership ensures accountability and clarity about who is responsible for monitoring and mitigating each risk.

Risk Management Lifecycle: The process typically involves identification, documentation, assessment, ownership assignment, and response planning.

Evaluation of Each Option:

A . Create a RAID log

A RAID log (Risks, Assumptions, Issues, and Dependencies) is a widely used tool in business analysis and project management for capturing and managing risks systematically.

It provides a centralized repository for tracking risks, assumptions, issues, and dependencies, ensuring that risks are documented comprehensively and transparently.

This aligns with best practices for risk management and is a critical first step in ensuring risks are appropriately recorded.

Conclusion: This is a must-do action.

B . Document the source of each risk

While documenting the source of each risk can provide valuable context, it is not a mandatory or primary step in the initial documentation phase.

Sources of risks are often identified during risk analysis or root cause analysis, which occurs after risks have been recorded.

Although useful, this step is secondary to creating a RAID log and assigning ownership.

Conclusion: This is not the most critical action at this stage.

C . Identify an owner for each risk

Assigning ownership for each risk is a fundamental part of risk management. Without clear ownership, risks may remain unmonitored or unaddressed.

Ownership ensures accountability and helps streamline communication and decision-making regarding risk mitigation strategies.

According to the BCS Business Analysis Framework , identifying risk owners is a key responsibility during the risk documentation process.

Conclusion: This is a must-do action.

D . Provide justification for each countermeasure identified

Justifying countermeasures is part of the risk response planning phase, which occurs after risks have been documented, assessed, and prioritized.

At this stage, John's focus should be on identifying and recording risks, not on evaluating or justifying solutions.

Conclusion: This is not relevant at the documentation stage.

E . Impact assessment of each countermeasure identified

Similar to option D, impact assessments for countermeasures are conducted during the risk response planning phase, not during the initial documentation phase.

This step is premature and does not align with the immediate need to document risks.

Conclusion: This is not relevant at the documentation stage.

Final Recommendation:

Based on the BCS Business Analysis Framework and industry best practices, the two most appropriate actions for John are:

Create a RAID log (to systematically document risks).

Identify an owner for each risk (to ensure accountability and clarity).

These steps ensure that risks are appropriately recorded and managed, laying the foundation for effective risk management.