Most Recent Broadcom 250-586 Exam Dumps

Within Symantec Endpoint Protection Manager (SEPM), Exceptions and Intrusion Prevention are two policy types that can be configured to manage endpoint security. Here's why these two are included:

Exceptions Policy: This policy type allows administrators to set exclusions for certain files, folders, or processes from being scanned or monitored, which is essential for optimizing performance and avoiding conflicts with trusted applications.

Intrusion Prevention Policy: This policy protects against network-based threats by detecting and blocking malicious traffic, playing a critical role in network security for endpoints.

Explanation of Why Other Options Are Less Likely:

Option B (Host Protection) and Option E (Process Control) are not recognized policy types in SEPM.

Option C (Shared Insight) refers to a technology within SEP that reduces scanning load, but it is not a policy type.

Thus, Exceptions and Intrusion Prevention are valid policy types within Symantec Endpoint Protection Manager.

The purpose of a Threat Defense for Active Directory Deceptive Account is to expose attackers as they attempt to gather credential information from workstation memory. These deceptive accounts are crafted to resemble legitimate credentials but are, in fact, traps that alert administrators to malicious activity. When an attacker attempts to access these deceptive credentials, it indicates potential unauthorized efforts to harvest credentials, allowing security teams to detect and respond to these intrusions proactively.

SES Complete Documentation explains the use of deceptive accounts as part of a proactive defense strategy, where false credentials are seeded in vulnerable areas to catch and track attacker movements within the network.

In a multi-site SEP Manager implementation, if one SEP Manager replication partner fails, the clients for that site automatically connect to the remaining SEP Managers. This setup provides redundancy, ensuring that client devices maintain protection and receive policy updates even if one manager becomes unavailable.

Redundancy in Multi-Site Setup: Multi-site SEP Manager deployments are designed with redundancy, allowing clients to failover to alternative SEP Managers within the environment if their primary replication partner fails.

Continuous Client Protection: With this failover, managed devices continue to be protected and can still receive updates and policies from other SEP Managers.

Explanation of Why Other Options Are Less Likely:

Option B (delayed replication) and Option C (discontinued protection) are incorrect as replication stops only for the failed manager, and client protection continues through other managers.

Option D suggests data retention locally without failover, which is not the standard approach in a multi-site setup.

Therefore, the correct answer is that clients for the affected site connect to the remaining SEP Managers, ensuring ongoing protection.

The purpose of the project close-out meeting in the Implement phase is to obtain the customer's official acceptance of the engagement deliverables. This meeting marks the formal conclusion of the project, where the consulting team presents the completed deliverables to the customer for approval. This step ensures that all agreed-upon goals have been met and provides an opportunity for the client to confirm satisfaction with the results, thereby formally closing the project.

SES Complete Implementation Curriculum notes that securing official acceptance is a crucial step to finalize the project, ensuring transparency and mutual agreement on the outcomes achieved.

A single site design in a SEP on-premise architecture is often chosen when centralized reporting without delay is a primary requirement. This design allows for real-time access to data and reports, as all data processing occurs within a single, centralized server environment.

Centralized Data Access: A single site design ensures that data is readily available without the delays that might occur with multi-site replication or distributed environments.

Efficient Reporting: With all logs, alerts, and reports centralized, administrators can quickly access real-time information, which is crucial for rapid response and monitoring.

Explanation of Why Other Options Are Less Likely:

Option A (geographic coverage) would typically favor a multi-site setup.

Option B (legal constraints on log retention) does not specifically benefit from a single site design.

Option D (control over WAN usage) is more relevant to distributed environments where WAN traffic management is necessary.

Therefore, centralized reporting with no delay is a key reason for opting for a single site design.