Trusted Worldwide Questions & Answers
Most Recent Databricks-Machine-Learning-Associate Exam Questions & Answers
Prepare for the Databricks Certified Machine Learning Associate Exam exam with our extensive collection of questions and answers. These practice Q&A are updated according to the latest syllabus, providing you with the tools needed to review and test your knowledge.
QA4Exam focus on the latest syllabus and exam objectives, our practice Q&A are designed to help you identify key topics and solidify your understanding. By focusing on the core curriculum, These Questions & Answers helps you cover all the essential topics, ensuring you're well-prepared for every section of the exam. Each question comes with a detailed explanation, offering valuable insights and helping you to learn from your mistakes. Whether you're looking to assess your progress or dive deeper into complex topics, our updated Q&A will provide the support you need to confidently approach the Databricks-Machine-Learning-Associate exam and achieve success.
The questions for Databricks-Machine-Learning-Associate were last updated on Jan 2, 2025.
- Viewing page 1 out of 15 pages.
- Viewing questions 1-5 out of 74 questions
A data scientist has written a data cleaning notebook that utilizes the pandas library, but their colleague has suggested that they refactor their notebook to scale with big data.
Which of the following approaches can the data scientist take to spend the least amount of time refactoring their notebook to scale with big data?
The data scientist can refactor their notebook to utilize the pandas API on Spark (now known as pandas on Spark, formerly Koalas). This allows for the least amount of changes to the existing pandas-based code while scaling to handle big data using Spark's distributed computing capabilities. pandas on Spark provides a similar API to pandas, making the transition smoother and faster compared to completely rewriting the code to use PySpark DataFrame API, Scala Dataset API, or Spark SQL. Reference:
Databricks documentation on pandas API on Spark (formerly Koalas).
A data scientist learned during their training to always use 5-fold cross-validation in their model development workflow. A colleague suggests that there are cases where a train-validation split could be preferred over k-fold cross-validation when k > 2.
Which of the following describes a potential benefit of using a train-validation split over k-fold cross-validation in this scenario?
A train-validation split is often preferred over k-fold cross-validation (with k > 2) when computational efficiency is a concern. With a train-validation split, only two models (one on the training set and one on the validation set) are trained, whereas k-fold cross-validation requires training k models (one for each fold).
This reduction in the number of models trained can save significant computational resources and time, especially when dealing with large datasets or complex models.
Model Evaluation with Train-Test Split
A data scientist is attempting to tune a logistic regression model logistic using scikit-learn. They want to specify a search space for two hyperparameters and let the tuning process randomly select values for each evaluation.
They attempt to run the following code block, but it does not accomplish the desired task:
Which of the following changes can the data scientist make to accomplish the task?
The user wants to specify a search space for hyperparameters and let the tuning process randomly select values. GridSearchCV systematically tries every combination of the provided hyperparameter values, which can be computationally expensive and time-consuming. RandomizedSearchCV, on the other hand, samples hyperparameters from a distribution for a fixed number of iterations. This approach is usually faster and still can find very good parameters, especially when the search space is large or includes distributions.
Reference
Scikit-Learn documentation on hyperparameter tuning: https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/grid_search.html#randomized-parameter-optimization
A new data scientist has started working on an existing machine learning project. The project is a scheduled Job that retrains every day. The project currently exists in a Repo in Databricks. The data scientist has been tasked with improving the feature engineering of the pipeline's preprocessing stage. The data scientist wants to make necessary updates to the code that can be easily adopted into the project without changing what is being run each day.
Which approach should the data scientist take to complete this task?
The best approach for the data scientist to take in this scenario is to create a new branch in Databricks, commit their changes, and push those changes to the Git provider. This approach allows the data scientist to make updates and improvements to the feature engineering part of the preprocessing pipeline without affecting the main codebase that runs daily. By creating a new branch, they can work on their changes in isolation. Once the changes are ready and tested, they can be merged back into the main branch through a pull request, ensuring a smooth integration process and allowing for code review and collaboration with other team members.
Databricks documentation on Git integration: Databricks Repos
A data scientist wants to efficiently tune the hyperparameters of a scikit-learn model. They elect to use the Hyperopt library's fmin operation to facilitate this process. Unfortunately, the final model is not very accurate. The data scientist suspects that there is an issue with the objective_function being passed as an argument to fmin.
They use the following code block to create the objective_function:
Which of the following changes does the data scientist need to make to their objective_function in order to produce a more accurate model?
When using the Hyperopt library with fmin, the goal is to find the minimum of the objective function. Since you are using cross_val_score to calculate the R2 score which is a measure of the proportion of the variance for a dependent variable that's explained by an independent variable(s) in a regression model, higher values are better. However, fmin seeks to minimize the objective function, so to align with fmin's goal, you should return the negative of the R2 score (-r2). This way, by minimizing the negative R2, fmin is effectively maximizing the R2 score, which can lead to a more accurate model.
Reference
Hyperopt Documentation: http://hyperopt.github.io/hyperopt/
Scikit-Learn documentation on model evaluation: https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/model_evaluation.html
Unlock All Questions for Databricks Databricks-Machine-Learning-Associate Exam
Full Exam Access, Actual Exam Questions, Validated Answers, Anytime Anywhere, No Download Limits, No Practice Limits
Get All 74 Questions & Answers