Prepare for the GitHub Foundations Exam exam with our extensive collection of questions and answers. These practice Q&A are updated according to the latest syllabus, providing you with the tools needed to review and test your knowledge.
QA4Exam focus on the latest syllabus and exam objectives, our practice Q&A are designed to help you identify key topics and solidify your understanding. By focusing on the core curriculum, These Questions & Answers helps you cover all the essential topics, ensuring you're well-prepared for every section of the exam. Each question comes with a detailed explanation, offering valuable insights and helping you to learn from your mistakes. Whether you're looking to assess your progress or dive deeper into complex topics, our updated Q&A will provide the support you need to confidently approach the GitHub-Foundations exam and achieve success.
Which of the following GitHub syntax formats is consistent with the associated text?
GitHub supports various syntax formats that align with Markdown and HTML conventions. Here's a breakdown of the provided options:
Comment Syntax:
Option C is correct. The syntax <!-- This is a comment --> is used in Markdown files to insert comments. These comments will not be rendered in the final output, making them useful for adding notes or instructions within the code or documentation.
Incorrect Options:
Option A (* This is a heading) is incorrect because an asterisk (*) denotes an unordered list item, not a heading. A heading in Markdown is typically created with one or more hash symbols (#).
Option B (This is a link) is incorrect because this is plain text and not the syntax for creating a link. The correct syntax would be [This is a link](URL).
Option D (This is bolded text) is incorrect because this is plain text, not the correct Markdown syntax for bold text, which should be **This is bolded text** or __This is bolded text__.
Option E (1. This is an ordered list) is incorrect as it does represent an ordered list item, but it was not the syntax format asked about in the question. The question specifically focuses on matching associated text with syntax, where only the comment option is correct.
What are two recommended ways of improving the discoverability of a repository?
(Each answer presents a complete solution. Choose two.)
Two recommended ways to improve the discoverability of a repository on GitHub are:
B . Create a README file describing the repository: A well-written README file provides essential information about the project, such as what it does, how to use it, and how to contribute. This is often the first thing potential users or contributors will see, making it critical for discoverability.
D . Add topics to classify the repository: Adding topics to your repository helps classify it under specific categories, making it easier for others to find it through GitHub's search and exploration features. Topics act like tags, helping to connect your project with users interested in similar subjects.
Registering a repository with GitHub search and adding labels are not applicable actions for improving discoverability in the broader sense.
How can a user highlight a post to the top of the Discussions page?
To highlight a post at the top of the Discussions page on GitHub, you can Pin the discussion. Pinning a discussion ensures it remains prominently visible at the top of the list, making it easier for others to find and participate in that discussion. This is particularly useful for important announcements or frequently referenced topics.
What are primary benefits of using GitHub issues templates?
(Each answer presents a complete solution. Choose two.)
The primary benefits of using GitHub issues templates include:
A . To automatically label or assign newly created issues: Issue templates can be configured to automatically apply labels or assign users when the issue is created, helping to streamline triage and management processes.
B . To provide an easy-to-fill-out form for creating new issues: Templates provide a standardized format for submitting issues, ensuring that all necessary information is captured and reducing the need for follow-up questions.
Coercing existing issues into a standard format or automatically creating new branches when issues are created are not functions provided by GitHub issues templates.
What layouts are available for GitHub Projects?
(Each answer presents a complete solution. Choose three.)
GitHub Projects supports various layouts to help teams organize and visualize their work. The available layouts include:
B . Kanban: This is a visual task management tool where tasks are represented as cards and moved across columns that represent different stages of work.
C . Board: This layout is similar to Kanban but can be more flexible, allowing users to set up boards in various ways to suit their workflow needs.
D . Table: The Table layout allows you to view your tasks in a spreadsheet-like format, making it easy to manage and edit large amounts of data at once.
Roadmap and Backlog are not standard layouts provided by GitHub Projects. While these terms might be relevant in other project management contexts, GitHub Projects specifically offers Kanban, Board, and Table layouts.
Full Exam Access, Actual Exam Questions, Validated Answers, Anytime Anywhere, No Download Limits, No Practice Limits
Get All 75 Questions & Answers