Prepare for the Google Professional Machine Learning Engineer exam with our extensive collection of questions and answers. These practice Q&A are updated according to the latest syllabus, providing you with the tools needed to review and test your knowledge.
QA4Exam focus on the latest syllabus and exam objectives, our practice Q&A are designed to help you identify key topics and solidify your understanding. By focusing on the core curriculum, These Questions & Answers helps you cover all the essential topics, ensuring you're well-prepared for every section of the exam. Each question comes with a detailed explanation, offering valuable insights and helping you to learn from your mistakes. Whether you're looking to assess your progress or dive deeper into complex topics, our updated Q&A will provide the support you need to confidently approach the Google Professional-Machine-Learning-Engineer exam and achieve success.
You built a custom ML model using scikit-learn. Training time is taking longer than expected. You decide to migrate your model to Vertex AI Training, and you want to improve the model's training time. What should you try out first?
Option A is incorrect because migrating your model to TensorFlow, and training it using Vertex AI Training, is not the easiest way to improve the model's training time. TensorFlow is a framework that allows you to create and train ML models using Python or other languages. Vertex AI Training is a service that allows you to train and optimize ML models using built-in algorithms or custom containers. However, this option requires significant code changes, as TensorFlow and scikit-learn have different APIs and functionalities. Moreover, this option does not leverage the parallelism or the scalability of the cloud, as it only uses a single instance.
Option B is incorrect because training your model in a distributed mode using multiple Compute Engine VMs, is not the most convenient way to improve the model's training time. Compute Engine is a service that allows you to create and manage virtual machines that run on Google Cloud. You can use Compute Engine to run your scikit-learn model in a distributed mode, by using libraries such as Dask or Joblib. However, this option requires more effort and resources than option D, as it involves creating and configuring the VMs, installing and maintaining the libraries, and writing and running the distributed code.
[scikit-learn overview]
[TensorFlow overview]
[Compute Engine overview]
[Dask overview]
[Joblib overview]
[Vertex AI Training overview]
You are pre-training a large language model on Google Cloud. This model includes custom TensorFlow operations in the training loop Model training will use a large batch size, and you expect training to take several weeks You need to configure a training architecture that minimizes both training time and compute costs What should you do?
A.
B.
D.
You manage a team of data scientists who use a cloud-based backend system to submit training jobs. This system has become very difficult to administer, and you want to use a managed service instead. The data scientists you work with use many different frameworks, including Keras, PyTorch, theano, scikit-learn, and custom libraries. What should you do?
The best option for using a managed service to submit training jobs with different frameworks is to use Vertex AI Training. Vertex AI Training is a fully managed service that allows you to train custom models on Google Cloud using any framework, such as TensorFlow, PyTorch, scikit-learn, XGBoost, etc. You can also use custom containers to run your own libraries and dependencies. Vertex AI Training handles the infrastructure provisioning, scaling, and monitoring for you, so you can focus on your model development and optimization. Vertex AI Training also integrates with other Vertex AI services, such as Vertex AI Pipelines, Vertex AI Experiments, and Vertex AI Prediction. The other options are not as suitable for using a managed service to submit training jobs with different frameworks, because:
Configuring Kubeflow to run on Google Kubernetes Engine and submit training jobs through TFJob would require more infrastructure maintenance, as Kubeflow is not a fully managed service, and you would have to provision and manage your own Kubernetes cluster. This would also incur more costs, as you would have to pay for the cluster resources, regardless of the training job usage. TFJob is also mainly designed for TensorFlow models, and might not support other frameworks as well as Vertex AI Training.
Creating a library of VM images on Compute Engine, and publishing these images on a centralized repository would require more development time and effort, as you would have to create and maintain different VM images for different frameworks and libraries. You would also have to manually configure and launch the VMs for each training job, and handle the scaling and monitoring yourself. This would not leverage the benefits of a managed service, such as Vertex AI Training.
Setting up Slurm workload manager to receive jobs that can be scheduled to run on your cloud infrastructure would require more configuration and administration, as Slurm is not a native Google Cloud service, and you would have to install and manage it on your own VMs or clusters. Slurm is also a general-purpose workload manager, and might not have the same level of integration and optimization for ML frameworks and libraries as Vertex AI Training.Reference:
Vertex AI Training | Google Cloud
Kubeflow on Google Cloud | Google Cloud
TFJob for training TensorFlow models with Kubernetes | Kubeflow
Your organization wants to make its internal shuttle service route more efficient. The shuttles currently stop at all pick-up points across the city every 30 minutes between 7 am and 10 am. The development team has already built an application on Google Kubernetes Engine that requires users to confirm their presence and shuttle station one day in advance. What approach should you take?
This answer is correct because it uses a regression model to estimate the number of passengers at each shuttle station, which is a continuous variable. A tree-based regression model can handle both numerical and categorical features, such as the time of day, the location of the station, and the weather conditions. Based on the predicted number of passengers, the organization can dispatch a shuttle that has enough capacity and provide a map that shows the required stops. This way, the organization can optimize the shuttle service route and reduce the waiting time and fuel consumption.Reference:
[Tree-based regression models]
You are working on a system log anomaly detection model for a cybersecurity organization. You have developed the model using TensorFlow, and you plan to use it for real-time prediction. You need to create a Dataflow pipeline to ingest data via Pub/Sub and write the results to BigQuery. You want to minimize the serving latency as much as possible. What should you do?
The best option for creating a Dataflow pipeline for real-time anomaly detection is to load the model directly into the Dataflow job as a dependency, and use it for prediction. This option has the following advantages:
It minimizes the serving latency, as the model prediction logic is executed within the same Dataflow pipeline that ingests and processes the data. There is no need to invoke external services or containers, which can introduce network overhead and latency.
It simplifies the deployment and management of the model, as the model is packaged with the Dataflow job and does not require a separate service or container. The model can be updated by redeploying the Dataflow job with a new model version.
It leverages the scalability and reliability of Dataflow, as the model prediction logic can scale up or down with the data volume and handle failures and retries automatically.
The other options are less optimal for the following reasons:
Option A: Containerizing the model prediction logic in Cloud Run, which is invoked by Dataflow, introduces additional latency and complexity. Cloud Run is a serverless platform that runs stateless containers, which means that the model prediction logic needs to be initialized and loaded every time a request is made. This can increase the cold start latency and reduce the throughput. Moreover, Cloud Run has a limit on the number of concurrent requests per container, which can affect the scalability of the model prediction logic. Additionally, this option requires managing two separate services: the Dataflow pipeline and the Cloud Run container.
Option C: Deploying the model to a Vertex AI endpoint, and invoking this endpoint in the Dataflow job, also introduces additional latency and complexity. Vertex AI is a managed service that provides various tools and features for machine learning, such as training, tuning, serving, and monitoring. However, invoking a Vertex AI endpoint from a Dataflow job requires making an HTTP request, which can incur network overhead and latency. Moreover, this option requires managing two separate services: the Dataflow pipeline and the Vertex AI endpoint.
Option D: Deploying the model in a TFServing container on Google Kubernetes Engine, and invoking it in the Dataflow job, also introduces additional latency and complexity. TFServing is a high-performance serving system for TensorFlow models, which can handle multiple versions and variants of a model. However, invoking a TFServing container from a Dataflow job requires making a gRPC or REST request, which can incur network overhead and latency. Moreover, this option requires managing two separate services: the Dataflow pipeline and the Google Kubernetes Engine cluster.
[Dataflow documentation]
[TensorFlow documentation]
[Cloud Run documentation]
[Vertex AI documentation]
[TFServing documentation]
Full Exam Access, Actual Exam Questions, Validated Answers, Anytime Anywhere, No Download Limits, No Practice Limits
Get All 283 Questions & Answers