Most Recent iSQI CTFL_Syll2018 Exam Dumps

Error, fault, failure is the option that describes the causal chain in the correct sequence1.The causal chain is a model that explains how defects are introduced and manifested in software1.An error is a human action or decision that produces an incorrect result1.A fault is a defect in the software caused by an error1.A failure is an incorrect behaviour of the software caused by a fault1. The other options do not describe the causal chain in the correct sequence. Option B uses synonyms for error (mistake), fault (bug), and failure (defect), but does not follow the correct order. Option C uses synonyms for error (mistake) and fault (failure), but does not follow the correct order and confuses fault with failure. Option D uses synonyms for fault (bug) and error (error), but does not follow the correct order and confuses failure with error.

Introducing the tool to all the test teams of the organization at the same time is a factor that could negatively influence the success of the deployment of a tool within an organization, as it may cause resistance, confusion, or overload among the test teams. A better approach would be to introduce the tool gradually and incrementally, starting with a pilot project or a small group of users, and then expanding to other test teams based on the feedback and results. suggests this as follows:

A pilot project should be conducted before introducing a new test tool into an organization in order to learn more about how to use it effectively and efficiently in your context and how it will interact with other tools and processes. A pilot project should involve a small group of users who are willing and able to experiment with the tool and provide feedback. The pilot project should have clear objectives, scope, duration, and success criteria.

B, C, and D are factors that could positively influence the success of the deployment of a tool within an organization. Collecting usage information of the tool from the early projects (B) can help to evaluate the benefits and drawbacks of the tool, identify areas for improvement, and justify the investment. Providing training and coaching for new users of the tool can help to increase their confidence and competence in using the tool, reduce errors and frustration, and enhance their productivity and satisfaction. Adapting and improving the processes to the usage of the tool (D) can help to optimize the workflow and performance of the test teams, align the tool with the organizational goals and standards, and increase the value and quality of the testing activities.

The Cambrian Pullman Express has special ticketing requirements represented by the partial decision table below. The decision table has six columns representing six rules and eight rows representing eight conditions or actions. The table is filled with ''Y'' and ''N'' values indicating whether a particular condition is met for a particular rule.

!decision table

Carol has a student railcard and is travelling on a Flexible Standard Class ticket. James has a senior railcard and is travelling on a super saver ticket. The question asks which of the options represents the correct actions for these two test cases. To answer this question, we need to find the matching rule for each test case and then look at the corresponding actions. For Carol, the matching rule is rule 2, as she has a student railcard (Y) and a Flexible Standard Class ticket (Y). The actions for rule 2 are: OK to travel (Y), eligible to upgrade (Y), and concessionary fare (N). Therefore, Carol is OK to travel and eligible to upgrade, but not entitled to a concessionary fare. For James, the matching rule is rule 6, as he has a senior railcard (Y) and a super saver ticket (N). The actions for rule 6 are: OK to travel (N), eligible to upgrade (N), and concessionary fare (N). Therefore, James cannot use the service, is not eligible to upgrade, and is not entitled to a concessionary fare. Among the options given in this question, only A correctly represents these actions. A says that Carol is eligible to upgrade and James cannot use the service. Therefore, A is the correct answer.

Equivalence partitioning is a technique that divides the input domain of a system into partitions or classes that are expected to behave similarly or produce similar outputs2.A test case can cover one value from each partition, as it is assumed that all values in the same partition are equivalent for testing purposes2. In this question, the groups of numbers fall into different equivalence classes based on the amount of customs duty to be paid, as shown below:

Group

Equivalence Classes

$20,000 $20,001 $30,001

No duty (up to $2,000), 10% duty ($2,001-$10,000), 12% duty ($10,001-$30,000), 17% duty (above $30,000)

$2,000 $2,001 $10,000

No duty (up to $2,000), 10% duty ($2,001-$10,000), 12% duty ($10,001-$30,000)

$2,000 $8,000 $20,000

No duty (up to $2,000), 10% duty ($2,001-$10,000), 12% duty ($10,001-$30,000)

$1,500 $2,000 $10,000

No duty (up to $2,000), 10% duty ($2,001-$10,000)

Statement testing is a white box test technique2.A white box technique is a technique that uses the internal structure or logic of a system as a test basis to derive test cases and measure test coverage2.Statement testing is a technique that uses executable statements in the source code as a test basis to measure the coverage achieved by a test suite2.A statement is an instruction or command that performs an action or calculation in the source code2.Statement testing requires every statement in the source code to be executed at least once by a test suite2. Therefore, statement testing is a white box test technique.