In which of the following aspects does the configuration of flex-algo LSPs have an advantage over the configuration of SR-TE LSPs?
Flex-Algo LSPs are a type of LSP that allows for greater flexibility in configuring traffic engineering constraints. This is because flex-algo LSPs can be configured with a unique set of traffic engineering constraints for each LSP, whereas SR-TE LSPs use a predefined set of traffic engineering constraints that applies to all LSPs.
Label stack size of the encapsulated data packets, List of traffic-engineering constraint types available to choose from, and Ability to associate one primary and up to two secondary paths to the same LSP are not the advantages of flex-algo LSPs over SR-TE LSPs.
Based on the configuration shown for routers R1 and R10, what valid flex-algo definitions exist in the network?
To create a flex-algo instance in a network, which of the following configuration steps is mandatory?
To create a flex-algo instance in a network, it's mandatory to configure at least one router in the network to create and advertise the flex-algo definition, This is the first step in creating a flex-algo instance, and it's done by defining the flex-algo instance and its properties on one or more routers in the network.
The other steps are important to fine-tune the flex-algo instance, but not mandatory to create it.
Configuring the proper values for the shared-risk link groups (SRLGs) that will define the flex-algo topology.
Specifying whether the LSP paths will be computed locally or by an external path computation element (PCE).
Configuring LSPs between every pair of PE routers.
Based on the exhibit, and given that the system IP address of router RIO is 10.10.10.10, which of the following statements is FALSE?
Based on the exhibit, which of the following statements about fast re-route for flex-algo instance 129 is TRUE?
Full Exam Access, Actual Exam Questions, Validated Answers, Anytime Anywhere, No Download Limits, No Practice Limits
Get All 40 Questions & Answers