Trusted Worldwide Questions & Answers
PECB ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Exam Actual Questions
The questions for ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager were last updated on Sep 18, 2024.
- Viewing page 1 out of 12 pages.
- Viewing questions 1-5 out of 60 questions
Scenario 8: Biotide is a pharmaceutical company that produces medication for treating different kinds of diseases. The company was founded in 1997, and since then it has contributed in solving some of the most challenging healthcare issues.
As a pharmaceutical company, Biotide operates in an environment associated with complex risks. As such, the company focuses on risk management strategies that ensure the effective management of risks to develop high-quality medication. With the large amount of sensitive information generated from the company, managing information security risks is certainly an important part of the overall risk management process. Biotide utilizes a publicly available methodology for conducting risk assessment related to information assets. This methodology helps Biotide to perform risk assessment by taking into account its objectives and mission. Following this method, the risk management process is organized into four activity areas, each of them involving a set of activities, as provided below.
1. Activity area 1: The organization determines the criteria against which the effects of a risk occurring can be evaluated. In addition, the impacts of risks are also defined.
2. Activity area 2: The purpose of the second activity area is to create information asset profiles. The organization identifies critical information assets, their owners, as well as the security requirements for those assets. After determining the security requirements, the organization prioritizes them. In addition, the organization identifies the systems that store, transmit, or process information.
3. Activity area 3: The organization identifies the areas of concern which initiates the risk identification process. In addition, the organization analyzes and determines the probability of the occurrence of possible threat scenarios.
4. Activity area 4: The organization identifies and evaluates the risks. In addition, the criteria specified in activity area 1 is reviewed and the consequences of the areas of concerns are evaluated. Lastly, the level of identified risks is determined.
The table below provides an example of how Biotide assesses the risks related to its information assets following this methodology:
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
Which risk assessment methodology does Biotide use?
Biotide uses the OCTAVE Allegro methodology for risk assessment. This is determined based on the description of the activities mentioned in the scenario. OCTAVE Allegro is a streamlined approach specifically designed to help organizations perform risk assessments that are efficient and effective, particularly when handling information assets. The methodology focuses on a thorough examination of information assets, the threats they face, and the impact of those threats.
Activity Area 1: OCTAVE Allegro defines the criteria for evaluating the impact of risks, which is consistent with determining the risk effects' evaluation criteria in the scenario.
Activity Area 2: In OCTAVE Allegro, a critical step is creating profiles for information assets, identifying their owners, and determining security requirements. This aligns with the activity in which Biotide identifies critical assets, their owners, and their security needs.
Activity Area 3: Identifying areas of concern that initiate risk identification and analyzing threat scenarios is central to OCTAVE Allegro. This is reflected in the activity of identifying areas of concern and determining the likelihood of threats.
Activity Area 4: Evaluating the risks, reviewing criteria, and determining risk levels corresponds to the latter stages of OCTAVE Allegro, where risks are prioritized based on the likelihood and impact, and risk management strategies are formulated accordingly.
The steps outlined align with the OCTAVE Allegro approach, which focuses on understanding and addressing information security risks comprehensively and in line with organizational objectives. Hence, option A, OCTAVE Allegro, is the correct answer.
ISO/IEC 27005:2018 emphasizes the importance of using structured methodologies for information security risk management, like OCTAVE Allegro, to ensure that risks are consistently identified, assessed, and managed in accordance with organizational risk tolerance and objectives.
Scenario 8: Biotide is a pharmaceutical company that produces medication for treating different kinds of diseases. The company was founded in 1997, and since then it has contributed in solving some of the most challenging healthcare issues.
As a pharmaceutical company, Biotide operates in an environment associated with complex risks. As such, the company focuses on risk management strategies that ensure the effective management of risks to develop high-quality medication. With the large amount of sensitive information generated from the company, managing information security risks is certainly an important part of the overall risk management process. Biotide utilizes a publicly available methodology for conducting risk assessment related to information assets. This methodology helps Biotide to perform risk assessment by taking into account its objectives and mission. Following this method, the risk management process is organized into four activity areas, each of them involving a set of activities, as provided below.
1. Activity area 1: The organization determines the criteria against which the effects of a risk occurring can be evaluated. In addition, the impacts of risks are also defined.
2. Activity area 2: The purpose of the second activity area is to create information asset profiles. The organization identifies critical information assets, their owners, as well as the security requirements for those assets. After determining the security requirements, the organization prioritizes them. In addition, the organization identifies the systems that store, transmit, or process information.
3. Activity area 3: The organization identifies the areas of concern which initiates the risk identification process. In addition, the organization analyzes and determines the probability of the occurrence of possible threat scenarios.
4. Activity area 4: The organization identifies and evaluates the risks. In addition, the criteria specified in activity area 1 is reviewed and the consequences of the areas of concerns are evaluated. Lastly, the level of identified risks is determined.
The table below provides an example of how Biotide assesses the risks related to its information assets following this methodology:
Based on scenario 8, how should Biotide use the criteria defined in the activity area 1?
According to ISO/IEC 27005, which provides guidelines for information security risk management, the criteria defined in Activity Area 1 are used to establish the foundation for evaluating the effects of a risk event on an organization's objectives. This is the first step in the risk management process, where the organization must identify its risk evaluation criteria, including the impact levels and their corresponding definitions.
In the context of Biotide, Activity Area 1 involves determining the criteria against which the effects of a risk occurring can be evaluated and defining the impacts of those risks. This directly aligns with ISO/IEC 27005 guidance, where the purpose of setting criteria is to ensure that the potential impact of any risk on the organization's objectives, such as reputation, customer confidence, and legal implications, is comprehensively understood and appropriately managed.
Option A, 'To evaluate the potential impact of the risk on Biotide's objectives,' is correct because it accurately describes the purpose of defining such criteria: to provide a consistent basis for assessing how various risk scenarios might affect the organization's ability to meet its strategic and operational goals.
Options B and C, which focus on identifying assets or determining the probability of threats, are related to later stages in the risk management process (specifically, Activities 2 and 3), where information assets are profiled and potential threat scenarios are analyzed. Therefore, these do not correspond to the initial criteria definition purpose outlined in Activity Area 1.
Scenario 8: Biotide is a pharmaceutical company that produces medication for treating different kinds of diseases. The company was founded in 1997, and since then it has contributed in solving some of the most challenging healthcare issues.
As a pharmaceutical company, Biotide operates in an environment associated with complex risks. As such, the company focuses on risk management strategies that ensure the effective management of risks to develop high-quality medication. With the large amount of sensitive information generated from the company, managing information security risks is certainly an important part of the overall risk management process. Biotide utilizes a publicly available methodology for conducting risk assessment related to information assets. This methodology helps Biotide to perform risk assessment by taking into account its objectives and mission. Following this method, the risk management process is organized into four activity areas, each of them involving a set of activities, as provided below.
1. Activity area 1: The organization determines the criteria against which the effects of a risk occurring can be evaluated. In addition, the impacts of risks are also defined.
2. Activity area 2: The purpose of the second activity area is to create information asset profiles. The organization identifies critical information assets, their owners, as well as the security requirements for those assets. After determining the security requirements, the organization prioritizes them. In addition, the organization identifies the systems that store, transmit, or process information.
3. Activity area 3: The organization identifies the areas of concern which initiates the risk identification process. In addition, the organization analyzes and determines the probability of the occurrence of possible threat scenarios.
4. Activity area 4: The organization identifies and evaluates the risks. In addition, the criteria specified in activity area 1 is reviewed and the consequences of the areas of concerns are evaluated. Lastly, the level of identified risks is determined.
The table below provides an example of how Biotide assesses the risks related to its information assets following this methodology:
According to the risk assessment methodology used by Biotide, what else should be performed during activity area 4? Refer to scenario 8.
In Activity Area 4 of the risk assessment methodology used by Biotide, the focus is on identifying and evaluating risks, reviewing the criteria defined in Activity Area 1, and evaluating the consequences of identified areas of concern to determine the level of risk. However, an essential part of completing a risk assessment process also includes determining appropriate mitigation strategies for the identified risks.
ISO/IEC 27005 provides guidance on selecting and implementing security measures to manage the risk to an acceptable level. Therefore, selecting a mitigation strategy for the identified risk profiles is a crucial next step. This involves deciding on controls or measures that will reduce either the likelihood of the threat exploiting the vulnerability or the impact of the risk should it occur. Thus, the correct answer is B.
ISO/IEC 27005:2018, Section 8.3.5 'Risk treatment' outlines the process of selecting appropriate risk treatment options (mitigation strategies) once risks have been identified and evaluated.
Scenario 8: Biotide is a pharmaceutical company that produces medication for treating different kinds of diseases. The company was founded in 1997, and since then it has contributed in solving some of the most challenging healthcare issues.
As a pharmaceutical company, Biotide operates in an environment associated with complex risks. As such, the company focuses on risk management strategies that ensure the effective management of risks to develop high-quality medication. With the large amount of sensitive information generated from the company, managing information security risks is certainly an important part of the overall risk management process. Biotide utilizes a publicly available methodology for conducting risk assessment related to information assets. This methodology helps Biotide to perform risk assessment by taking into account its objectives and mission. Following this method, the risk management process is organized into four activity areas, each of them involving a set of activities, as provided below.
1. Activity area 1: The organization determines the criteria against which the effects of a risk occurring can be evaluated. In addition, the impacts of risks are also defined.
2. Activity area 2: The purpose of the second activity area is to create information asset profiles. The organization identifies critical information assets, their owners, as well as the security requirements for those assets. After determining the security requirements, the organization prioritizes them. In addition, the organization identifies the systems that store, transmit, or process information.
3. Activity area 3: The organization identifies the areas of concern which initiates the risk identification process. In addition, the organization analyzes and determines the probability of the occurrence of possible threat scenarios.
4. Activity area 4: The organization identifies and evaluates the risks. In addition, the criteria specified in activity area 1 is reviewed and the consequences of the areas of concerns are evaluated. Lastly, the level of identified risks is determined.
The table below provides an example of how Biotide assesses the risks related to its information assets following this methodology:
Based on the table provided in scenario 8, did Biotide follow all the steps of the risk assessment methodology regarding the identification of assets?
Based on the scenario, Biotide follows a methodology where the identification of critical assets is part of Activity Area 2. However, according to ISO/IEC 27005, after identifying the critical assets, the organization should also identify and document the asset owners.
ISO/IEC 27005:2018 emphasizes that the asset owner is responsible for the protection of the asset and that understanding ownership is critical to implementing effective risk management controls. In the given table, the scenario does not explicitly mention defining the asset owners after identifying critical assets, which is a necessary step. Therefore, the correct answer is B.
ISO/IEC 27005:2018, Section 7.2.2 'Identification of assets, owners, and risk sources' details the steps required for proper asset identification, including defining the asset owners as a critical part of the risk assessment process.
Scenario 8: Biotide is a pharmaceutical company that produces medication for treating different kinds of diseases. The company was founded in 1997, and since then it has contributed in solving some of the most challenging healthcare issues.
As a pharmaceutical company, Biotide operates in an environment associated with complex risks. As such, the company focuses on risk management strategies that ensure the effective management of risks to develop high-quality medication. With the large amount of sensitive information generated from the company, managing information security risks is certainly an important part of the overall risk management process. Biotide utilizes a publicly available methodology for conducting risk assessment related to information assets. This methodology helps Biotide to perform risk assessment by taking into account its objectives and mission. Following this method, the risk management process is organized into four activity areas, each of them involving a set of activities, as provided below.
1. Activity area 1: The organization determines the criteria against which the effects of a risk occurring can be evaluated. In addition, the impacts of risks are also defined.
2. Activity area 2: The purpose of the second activity area is to create information asset profiles. The organization identifies critical information assets, their owners, as well as the security requirements for those assets. After determining the security requirements, the organization prioritizes them. In addition, the organization identifies the systems that store, transmit, or process information.
3. Activity area 3: The organization identifies the areas of concern which initiates the risk identification process. In addition, the organization analyzes and determines the probability of the occurrence of possible threat scenarios.
4. Activity area 4: The organization identifies and evaluates the risks. In addition, the criteria specified in activity area 1 is reviewed and the consequences of the areas of concerns are evaluated. Lastly, the level of identified risks is determined.
The table below provides an example of how Biotide assesses the risks related to its information assets following this methodology:
Based on the table provided in scenario 8, did Biotide prioritize the security requirements for electronic health records?
Based on the table provided in Scenario 8, Biotide has prioritized the security requirements for its electronic health records. In Activity Area 2, the table clearly indicates that confidentiality is considered the most important security feature for electronic health records. This prioritization is based on the need to ensure that only authorized users have access to these critical information assets due to the sensitive nature of the data involved.
The emphasis on confidentiality aligns with ISO/IEC 27005 guidelines, which recommend prioritizing security requirements based on the impact assessment and the organization's risk management objectives. In this case, the potential impact of unauthorized access (breach of confidentiality) to electronic health records is high, which justifies Biotide's decision to prioritize confidentiality over other security requirements such as integrity or availability.
Option A is correct because it reflects the prioritization decision documented in the table, while options B and C are inaccurate as they either misrepresent the prioritization process or suggest that it did not occur.
Unlock All Questions for PECB ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Exam
Full Exam Access, Actual Exam Questions, Validated Answers, Anytime Anywhere, No Download Limits, No Practice Limits
Get All 60 Questions & Answers