Most Recent PRMIA 8020 Exam Dumps

Definition of Bottom-Up Key Risk Indicators (KRIs)

Bottom-up KRIs are generated from operational-level data rather than high-level strategic indicators.

They are useful for monitoring localized risks but may fail to capture broad risk drivers.

Key Deficiencies of Bottom-Up KRIs

Lack of clarity on causal relationships -- These indicators may detect risk trends but fail to explain root causes.

Focus on micro-level risks -- They may miss systemic or enterprise-wide risk interactions.

Why Answer B is Correct

Bottom-up KRIs may indicate changes in risk levels but lack insight into the underlying causes, leading to reactive rather than proactive risk management.

Why Other Answers Are Incorrect

Option

Explanation

A . Mandates from a board that are too restrictive to implement.

Incorrect -- Board mandates apply to top-down governance, not bottom-up KRIs.

C . Not reported frequently enough.

Incorrect -- Reporting frequency is an issue but not the primary deficiency; rather, it's the lack of causal insight.

D . Lack of granularity.

Incorrect -- Bottom-up KRIs tend to be highly detailed (granular), making this answer incorrect.

PRMIA Reference for Verification

PRMIA Key Risk Indicator Best Practices

Basel Committee's Risk Measurement and Reporting Framework

Definition of Consumer Protection in Risk Management

Consumer protection ensures ethical business practices, transparency, and regulatory compliance.

It builds trust with customers and reduces legal and reputational risks.

Key Principles of Consumer Protection

Treating customers fairly Ensures honest and ethical financial services.

Prioritizing customer interests Prevents conflicts of interest and unfair treatment.

Honoring commitments Strengthens customer confidence and regulatory trust.

Why Answer C is Correct

Following these principles ensures regulatory compliance, customer satisfaction, and risk mitigation.

Why Other Answers Are Incorrect

Option

Explanation

A . Engage with consumers once there are enough complaints.

Incorrect -- Proactive engagement is essential; waiting for complaints is a reactive and poor risk management approach.

B . Add a consumer protection section to all reports.

Incorrect -- Documentation alone does not ensure fair treatment; actions matter more.

D . This risk cannot be managed.

Incorrect -- Consumer protection risks can and should be actively managed.

PRMIA Reference for Verification

PRMIA Consumer Protection & Fair Treatment Standards

Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) Consumer Duty Guidelines

Step 1: What Is a Risk Assessment Workshop?

A risk assessment workshop is a structured session where key stakeholders identify, evaluate, and prioritize risks.

Effective workshops require preparation, clear objectives, and structured discussions to ensure meaningful risk analysis.

Step 2: Why Option B is Correct

PRMIA and best practices recommend thorough preparation, including:

Setting objectives

Defining risk categories

Ensuring participation from risk, compliance, and business units

Providing risk assessment tools/templates

Step 3: Why the Other Options Are Incorrect

Option A ('Run spontaneously') Incorrect because lack of preparation leads to poor discussions and missed risks.

Option C ('Risk management should not attend') Incorrect because risk managers provide key expertise to guide discussions.

Option D ('Compliance experts should not attend') Incorrect because compliance provides regulatory insights essential to risk assessment.

PRMIA Risk Reference Used:

PRMIA Risk Assessment Framework -- Recommends structured, well-prepared workshops.

ISO 31000 Risk Management Standard -- Supports proactive workshop planning.

Final Conclusion:

Risk assessment workshops should be well-prepared to ensure meaningful discussions and effective risk identification, making Option B the correct answer.

Key Resources for Calibrating Risk Appetite

Risk appetite defines how much risk an organization is willing to accept to achieve its objectives.

Two of the most critical resources for maintaining confidence and setting risk appetite are net earnings and capital.

Why Net Earnings and Capital are Critical

Net earnings reflect profitability and financial stability, influencing risk-taking capacity.

Capital ensures that the institution can absorb losses and meet regulatory requirements.

Basel III emphasizes capital adequacy as a core measure of financial resilience.

Why Answer B is Correct

Net earnings support operational stability, while capital determines how much risk an institution can bear.

Both are used to define and calibrate risk appetite levels.

Why Other Answers Are Incorrect

Option

Explanation

A . Capital expenditure and liquidity.

Incorrect -- Capital expenditure is an investment measure, not a direct risk appetite determinant.

C . Strong regulatory assessment and net earnings.

Incorrect -- Regulatory assessments are important but do not directly set risk appetite.

D . Quality human resources and reputation.

Incorrect -- HR and reputation are important for governance but do not directly influence risk capital and earnings stability.

PRMIA Reference for Verification

PRMIA Risk Appetite Framework

Basel III Capital and Earnings Management Guidelines

tep 1: Purpose of Internal Loss Investigations

Internal loss investigations analyze past loss events to identify root causes, improve controls, and enhance risk assessments.

Step 2: Why Option A Is Correct

Root Cause Analysis: Identifying why the loss occurred.

Focus on Remediation: Implementing corrective measures to prevent recurrence.

Scenario Analysis Improvement: Using lessons learned to enhance risk scenario modeling.

Step 3: Why the Other Options Are Incorrect

Option B ('Focus on who caused the issue') Incorrect because loss investigations are about systemic issues, not assigning blame.

Option C ('Ascertain responsibility for the loss event') Incorrect because the focus is on process improvements, not individual accountability.

Option D ('Determined by HR on a case-by-case basis') Incorrect because HR does not dictate risk investigations---risk and compliance functions do.

PRMIA Risk Reference Used:

PRMIA Operational Risk Framework -- Emphasizes loss investigations for systemic risk management.

Basel III Risk Governance Standards -- Defines loss event analysis as a key risk management tool.