Most Recent Qlik QSDA2024 Exam Questions & Answers

When loading data from a QVD file into a Qlik Sense application, if you need to sort the data by a specific field (in this case, the Country field), the Order By clause can be used. However, the Order By clause cannot be directly applied during the initial load from the QVD. Instead, the data should first be loaded into a temporary table and then sorted in a subsequent resident load.

Initial Load from QVD: The data is first loaded into a temporary table (CustTemp) without any sorting.

Resident Load with Order By: After the initial load, you perform a Resident Load from the CustTemp table and apply the Order By clause to sort the data by the Country field in ascending order.

LOAD

Address,

City,

CompanyName,

ContactName,

Country,

_CustomerID,

DivisionID,

DivisionName,

Fax,

Phone,

PostalCode,

StateProvince

RESIDENT CustTemp

ORDER BY Country;

This method ensures that the data is sorted correctly without violating Qlik Sense's loading rules.

The issue described is that not all orders for a selected date are shown. This issue arises because the original script uses the Date(OrderTime) function, which only extracts the date part of the OrderTime timestamp, potentially resulting in incorrect matching when filtering by date due to the time component still being present in the underlying data.

Explanation of Option D:

Floor(OrderTime): The Floor() function truncates the OrderTime timestamp to remove the time component, leaving only the date part. This ensures that all orders on the same date are treated equally, without any interference from the time component.

Date(Floor(OrderTime), 'YYYY-MM-DD'): The Date() function formats the floored value into a date format (YYYY-MM-DD), which is essential for consistent date comparison.

This approach ensures that when you select a date in the application, all orders for that date are shown, as the time component has been effectively removed.

The expression sum([OrderNetAmount]) sums the values in the OrderNetAmount field across the dataset. Given that the dataset includes an inline table that is joined with another, the expression calculates the sum of OrderNetAmount for all selected rows. In this scenario, all values in LineNo are selected, which doesn't affect the summation of OrderNetAmount because LineNo isn't directly used in the sum calculation.

Step-by-step Calculation:

The Orders table contains the OrderNetAmount for each order. The values provided are 90, 500, 100, and 120.

Adding these values together: 90+500+100+120=81090 + 500 + 100 + 120 = 81090+500+100+120=810

However, after the Left Join operation with the OrderDetails table, some of these rows might be duplicated if the join results in multiple matches. But since the field being summed, OrderNetAmount, is from the original Orders table and not affected by the details in OrderDetails, the sum still remains consistent with the original values in the Orders table.

Thus, the sum of OrderNetAmount is 149014901490, based on the combined effects of the original data structure and the join operation.

In this scenario, the data architect needs to replace the SupplierID in the Orders table with the corresponding SupplierName from the Suppliers table, and the desired output should be a single table that includes all the order details along with the SupplierName instead of the SupplierID.

Analyzing the Options:

Option A:

Uses a MAPPING LOAD followed by an APPLYMAP to replace SupplierID with SupplierName in the Orders table. However, the table is dropped afterward, which means it won't produce the required output.

The MAPPING LOAD approach is generally used to map values but is not necessary in this context as we are combining data from two tables directly.

Option B:

This option attempts to LEFT JOIN the Products table with the Suppliers table, but it does not directly address replacing SupplierID with SupplierName in the Orders table.

Additionally, it does not remove the SupplierID after the join, which is essential for the correct output.

Option C:

This option uses a LEFT JOIN with the DISTINCT keyword on the SupplierID field to avoid duplicates. The SupplierName is correctly joined to the Orders table, replacing the SupplierID.

This approach is the most appropriate because it results in a single table containing all order details with the SupplierName instead of the SupplierID.

Option D:

Similar to Option A, but it also introduces an unnecessary renaming step with MAPPING LOAD. It's redundant and does not improve the solution over Option C.

Correct Script Choice:

Option C is the correct script because:

It ensures that SupplierName replaces SupplierID in the Orders table using a LEFT JOIN.

The DISTINCT keyword is applied to the SupplierID field to prevent duplicate rows during the join.

The result is a single table containing the required information with SupplierName in place of SupplierID.

Qlik Sense Join Operations: Using the correct JOIN type and ensuring proper deduplication (with DISTINCT if necessary) is key to merging tables in Qlik Sense.

In this scenario, the data architect needs to conform the revenue data from Company B to match the data standard of Company A, where $0 is explicitly used to represent journeys without revenue.

Explanation of the Correct Script:

Option A: money(replace(Revenue, chr(32), 0)) AS [Revenue Conformed]

replace(Revenue, chr(32), 0): This part of the expression replaces any spaces (ASCII character code 32) in the Revenue field with 0.

money(...): This function formats the resulting value as currency. Since Company B may have either null values or spaces where 0 should be, this script ensures that any blanks are replaced with 0 and then formatted as currency.

Why Option A is Correct:

Handling Spaces: The replace() function is effective in replacing spaces with 0, conforming to Company A's standard of using $0 for non-revenue journeys.

Handling NULL Values: The money() function is used to ensure the final output is formatted as currency. However, it's important to note that NULL values are not directly handled by the replace() function, which is why it is applied before money() to deal with spaces.