Most Recent Scaled Agile SAFe-SGP Exam Dumps

According to theScrum Masterarticle on the Scaled Agile Framework website, the Scrum Master should talk to the Product Owner, compare the new work to existing backlog priorities, and negotiate a sustainable solution when the Product Owner raises a red flag stating there is an additional requirement that needs to be added to the current Iteration. The article states that ''The Scrum Master helps the Product Owner manage the backlog effectively by facilitating backlog refinement and prioritization. The Scrum Master also helps the Product Owner understand and apply the concepts of WSJF, MVP, MMF, and other economic prioritization methods. The Scrum Master supports the Product Owner in negotiating with stakeholders, customers, and the team to ensure that the backlog items are clear, concise, and ready for implementation.'' Therefore, the correct answer is B, talk to the Product Owner, compare the new work to existing backlog priorities, and negotiate a sustainable solution. The other options are not accurate, as they do not follow the Scrum principles of self-organization, time-boxing, and delivering value. Meeting with the team and accepting the work if they agree to work overtime (A) would violate the team's autonomy and sustainability. Accepting the work and extending the Iteration would disrupt the cadence and synchronization of the team and the ART. Refusing the new requirement (D) would ignore the feedback and collaboration of the Product Owner and the stakeholders.

The Manifesto for Agile Software Development, also known as the Agile Manifesto, is a shared set of values and principles intended to improve software development1. The Agile Manifesto was created in 2001 by a group of 17 software practitioners who wanted to find a better way of developing software than the traditional, documentation-driven, and heavyweight processes.The Agile Manifesto states four values and twelve principles that guide the agile approach to software development, which emphasizes individuals and interactions, working software, customer collaboration, and responding to change2.The Agile Manifesto is not a specific methodology or practice, but rather a philosophy that can be applied to various agile frameworks, such as Scrum, Kanban, XP, and SAFe3.

1:Manifesto for Agile Software Development2:What is the Agile Manifesto? | Agile Principles and Values - ProductPlan3:The Agile Manifesto - Project Management Institute

According to theCore Valuesarticle on the Scaled Agile Framework website, relentless improvement is one of the four core values of SAFe, along with alignment, transparency, and respect for people. The article states that ''Relentless improvement is a constant sense of danger combined with a paranoid desire to find a better way. It's a culture of organizational self-assessment, problem-solving, and action. It's a willingness to change before the crisis forces us to do so. It's a commitment to relentless reflection and a continuous learning journey.'' Therefore, the correct answer is C, relentless improvement. The other options are not accurate, as they are not the core values of SAFe. Intrinsic motivation of knowledge workers is a principle, not a value, of SAFe. Individuals and interactions is a value of the Agile Manifesto, not of SAFe. Built-in quality is an aspect of SAFe, not a value.

Two statements that accurately describe the SAFe Implementation Roadmap are:

It reflects success patterns from previous implementations of SAFe.The SAFe Implementation Roadmap is based on the experiences and learnings of hundreds of enterprises that have successfully adopted SAFe1.It captures the common critical moves and best practices that have proven to be effective in implementing SAFe in a reliable and predictable way2.

It provides recommended sequencing of role-based training.The SAFe Implementation Roadmap includes a step for training Lean-Agile change agents, who are the key enablers and coaches of the transformation3. It also suggests the appropriate role-based training for executives, managers, leaders, and teams, as well as the timing and sequence of the training in relation to the launch of the ARTs. The training helps to build the knowledge and skills needed to apply SAFe principles and practices at various levels of the enterprise.

According to theGovernment Articleon the Scaled Agile Framework website, feature progress charts and burn-up charts are two visual reporting tools that can be used to help maintain fiduciary tracking of government technology programs. The article states that ''SAFe provides a wide array of metrics and management tools to monitor program performance. Other metrics---such as feature progress charts, ART Kanban boards, burn-up charts, and continuous flow diagrams (Figure 3)---make program performance highly visible and transparent, enabling better fiduciary control.'' Therefore, the correct answers are C, feature progress charts, and D, burn-up charts. The other options are not accurate, as they are not the visual reporting tools that can be used to help maintain fiduciary tracking of government technology programs. Detailed spreadsheets (A) are not visual tools, but rather data sources that can be used to create visual reports. Pro formas (B) are financial statements that project future outcomes, not track current performance. Integrated master schedules (E) are traditional project management tools that show the dependencies and milestones of various tasks, not the value delivery and progress of features.