Most Recent Scaled Agile SAFe-SGP Exam Questions & Answers

Taking an economic view is the SAFe principle that ensures the maximum benefit is generated by understanding trade-offs between risks, cost of delay, operational costs, and development costs for each program and value stream1. This principle requires a fundamental understanding of the economics of building systems and making decisions in a proper economic context.This includes the strategy for incremental value delivery and the broader economic framework for each value stream2.Taking an economic view helps to optimize the flow of value, reduce waste, and deliver solutions that meet customer and stakeholder needs3.

1:SAFe Lean-Agile Principles - Scaled Agile Framework2:Principle #1 -- Take an economic view - Scaled Agile Framework3:Adopting Lean Budgeting Aligned to Development Value Streams

The Manifesto for Agile Software Development, also known as the Agile Manifesto, is a shared set of values and principles intended to improve software development1. The Agile Manifesto was created in 2001 by a group of 17 software practitioners who wanted to find a better way of developing software than the traditional, documentation-driven, and heavyweight processes.The Agile Manifesto states four values and twelve principles that guide the agile approach to software development, which emphasizes individuals and interactions, working software, customer collaboration, and responding to change2.The Agile Manifesto is not a specific methodology or practice, but rather a philosophy that can be applied to various agile frameworks, such as Scrum, Kanban, XP, and SAFe3.

1:Manifesto for Agile Software Development2:What is the Agile Manifesto? | Agile Principles and Values - ProductPlan3:The Agile Manifesto - Project Management Institute

According to theAdapting Governance Practices to Support Agility and Lean Flow of Valuearticle on the Scaled Agile Framework website, the Incremental Capability Review is an objective-based progress review that replaces the traditional phase-gate reviews. The article states that ''The Incremental Capability Review (ICR) is a new governance practice that provides a more effective way to measure progress and manage risk. It is based on the principle of objective evidence of working systems rather than subjective opinions and documentation. The ICR is a lightweight, collaborative, and transparent review process that aligns with the PI cadence and events. It leverages the System Demo, Inspect and Adapt, and PI Planning to provide frequent and incremental checks of the solution's fitness for purpose and compliance with relevant standards and regulations.'' Therefore, the correct answer is A, it is an objective-based progress review. The other options are not accurate, as the ICR is not the default for phase-gate reviews, it is not a document-based progress measure, and it does not ensure manual review of processes.

According to theSolution Trainarticle on the Scaled Agile Framework website, Solution Trains are the organizational construct used to build large solutions that require the coordination of multiple ARTs and suppliers. The article states that ''Solution Trains form for different reasons. Some trains form with new ARTs and Agile Teams to specifically address a large initiative, while others begin by combining existing ARTs and teams.'' Therefore, the correct answer is D, when the size and complexity require two or more ARTs. The other options are not relevant to the definition of a Solution Train.

According to theGovernment Articleon the Scaled Agile Framework website, feature progress charts and burn-up charts are two visual reporting tools that can be used to help maintain fiduciary tracking of government technology programs. The article states that ''SAFe provides a wide array of metrics and management tools to monitor program performance. Other metrics---such as feature progress charts, ART Kanban boards, burn-up charts, and continuous flow diagrams (Figure 3)---make program performance highly visible and transparent, enabling better fiduciary control.'' Therefore, the correct answers are C, feature progress charts, and D, burn-up charts. The other options are not accurate, as they are not the visual reporting tools that can be used to help maintain fiduciary tracking of government technology programs. Detailed spreadsheets (A) are not visual tools, but rather data sources that can be used to create visual reports. Pro formas (B) are financial statements that project future outcomes, not track current performance. Integrated master schedules (E) are traditional project management tools that show the dependencies and milestones of various tasks, not the value delivery and progress of features.